Platform & method

Execution, made measurable.

Execution is not a mood and not a slogan. It is a production system for decisions and coordination — and, for the first time, one that can be measured on a timeline that fits how commitments actually get made.

Operating definition. Execution is the reliability and speed with which an organization converts intent into coordinated action. IntegrisIQ organizes hard-to-read organizational signals into a structured, measurable, decision-useful view — a system, not a single model.

The measurement framework

Nine indices that describe how work really moves.

The dimensions hold across segments but re-weight by thesis. Directly measured core indices feed combinatorial derivatives, resolving into two top-line outputs on every brief: an Execution Capability Score (strength) and a Risk Score (exposure) — both thesis-weighted, confidence-adjusted, and fully traceable.

SMIStructural Mood Index
Destructive vs. constructive mood, morale signals, and workforce sentiment dynamics — the affective climate that shapes coordination and effort.

CPIConveying Practices Index
The rituals, routines, and practices that embed execution behaviors and governance discipline — how work actually gets done and how culture is transmitted.

NHINetwork Health Index
Relational structure: cross-silo connectivity, collaboration pathways, silos and toxic hubs, handoff quality.

PFCPolitical Friction Cost
Political drag and misalignment cost — time and energy lost to turf battles, hidden vetoes, escalation loops, and decision rework.

CMRChange Maturity & Readiness
Capacity to adapt: readiness to pivot from negative to constructive states, absorb change, and sustain new routines.

LCLeadership Cohesion
Leadership alignment and cohesion, priority conflicts, outliers and flight risks.

T&ATrust & Accountability
Reliability, ownership, accountability clarity, and the trust that permits early risk escalation.

ICInnovation Capacity
Ability to innovate and absorb new ways of working — experimentation, piloting, and learning capture.

DVIDecision Velocity Index
Decision speed, clarity, and throughput — whether decisions are made, stick, and move at the pace the commitment requires.

→Two top-line outputs
Every index rolls up to an Execution Capability Score and a Risk Score — the numbers a committee can debate and defend.

Evidence discipline

Confidence is a first-class output — not a footnote.

Signal outputs separate observed evidence from inference, assign explicit confidence to every material point, and record it all in a Signal Log so stakeholders debate facts and implications — not vibes.

Confidence is computed from channel coverage, consistency across roles and functions, recency, identity certainty, and sample adequacy. Contradictions are surfaced, not averaged away. That is what lets a buyer defend a Proceed / Conditional / No-Go call — and write mitigations that match reality.

Procurement-safe by design. Tier A uses public-signal proxies only — no claims of private access, no fabricated sources, clean separation of evidence from inference, and an auditable log. Tier B adds direct measurement while preserving anonymity.

Signal Log — excerpt

TRACEABLE · CONFIDENCE-LABELLED

EVLeadership tenure < 18 mo across 3 of 5 C-suite roles — filings.

EVPublic commitments repeatedly reset on delivery dates — press.

INFPattern implies decision latency on cross-functional work.

INFEscalation likely routes through a single key node (NHI risk).

EVCounter-signal: strong customer-retention proof reduces T&A risk.

How it works, end to end

One repeatable motion, thesis to governance.

STEP 01

Lock the thesis

Your decision context, constraints, and risk gates become explicit hypotheses and decision conditions — strategic vs. financial weighting set up front.

STEP 02

Capture evidence

Tier A harvests public-signal proxies mapped to the indices; Tier B adds direct measurement — SMI-Lite surveys and AI-led interviews aligned to the gates.

STEP 03

Compute confidence

Evidence quality drives a confidence model that converts scores into decision strength — proceed, proceed with conditions, or stop.

STEP 04

Produce governance

The system assembles the Decision Brief, Evidence Log, and contract-ready Mitigation Exhibits that drop straight into your own process.

The engine

Agentic AI, kept on a leash.

A pipeline of agents makes the whole system scalable and repeatable — while a measurement ontology and a confidence model keep it disciplined enough to circulate in a formal forum.

Collect & compute

Gather the signal

Orchestrate targeted instruments across public and direct channels; compute the indices; calibrate to sector and size.

Reason & recommend

Diagnose the drag

Identify the bottlenecks that steal speed and reliability; simulate scenarios; package decisions, gates, and playbooks.

Operate & orchestrate

Run the cadence

Export decision calendars, forum charters, and checklists that sit in the reviews you already run — human-in-the-loop, no rip-and-replace.

Additive, not disruptive. IntegrisIQ coexists with your stack (Jira / ServiceNow, CRM / ERP, HRIS) by exporting decision-ready tiles and cadences — and amplifies your consultants rather than replacing them.

What you receive

The same three decision-grade artifacts, every time.

Built to circulate through Investment Committees, Steering Committees, and procurement forums in days — and to become your internal operating language for execution risk.

01 · Decision Brief

The call

Proceed / Conditional Proceed / No-Go, with explicit decision conditions and rationale. One page, forum-ready.

02 · Evidence Log

The proof

Traceable evidence mapped to each gating condition: what we know, how sure we are, and why — down to the source.

03 · Mitigation Exhibits

The terms

Contract-ready governance clauses: cadence, escalation logic, accountability maps, and pass/fail gates.